What Does The Name Of The Almighty God ("YHWH"
or "JHWH")
"Method for the Generation of Self-Organizing Processes for Autonomous
Mechanisms and Organisms"
US
US 6172941 (filing date Dec. 16, 1999)
Author:
Erich
Bieramperl, 4040 Linz, Austria
Mean in Epistemoloy And Propositional Calculus?
see:
Excerpt of Patent
Description:
EP
EP 01145406 A1 (filing date Dec. 03,1999)
For a better overall understanding, see the most important points,
principles and findings from the
description "Method for the Generation of Self-Organizing Processes for Autonomous Mechanisms and Organisms":
variation
exists
between its own physical state and that of its surroundings. In order to
do
this, a
multiplicity of sensors or receptors 135a, b...,n are necessary.
meters for the
temporal-spatial variations vm(1,2 ...n) between sensors
135a,b,....n and
external signal
sources. These deviations are identical to the "relative speeds"
vm(1,2,...n).
Note:
vm(1,2,...,n) are always acquired by means of an invariant time counting
frequency
f, respectively, at
an
absolute time base.
138 (or time data memories) and form
STQ time data patterns Tw'(1,2....n) or Td'(1,2...n),
which serve as reference patterns. If the
organism finds sub-sequences of these Tw' or
Td'
patterns which in some combination are
covariant with a currently recorded Tw or Td
-
pattern, then the organism interprets these
combinations of sub-sequences as an "iso-
morphous pattern" significant for defining the
"actually perceived event-pattern" (i.e. what
actually is). In this way, the present event
(represented by temporal or spatial deviations
between sensors and external signal sources)
is "recognized".
motion) in such a manner, that the change is
highly covariant with a prior recorded
pattern of change of a temporal-spatial
condition (it emulates the prior pattern). Because
the shortest and most efficient time patterns
have a tendency to be of high priority while
new Tw or Td
sequences are
being recorded in the memory, organisms continuously try to
optimize changes in temporal-spatial conditions. Both processes result
exclusively from
comparison of quantized STQ elapse times and
from recognition of isomorphous time data
patterns (see also Fig. 5), and are termed "auto-emulation" and
"auto-optimization"; or,
equivalently, "autocovariance behaviour".
capability for auto-adaptation and
auto-emulation is required of an organism. It can be said
that the above fundamental principles are
valid not only for robotics and biological units,
but also for molecular atomic and subatomic
structures. Also, these have to be "time
sensing organisms" otherwise they can have no
basis for existence. Consequently: time,
space - every physical quantity – only
sensorial together with distinct sensitivity zones;
and these form the basis for local subjective
time sensing together with a general universal
tendency for auto-adaptation, auto-optimisation, and auto-emulation.
This is a fundamental
teleological principle.
1) The
"primary act" of every autonomous organism (including autonomous
self-organizing
robots) is to "explore" their surroundings
in order to ascertain whether temporal-spatial
2) Only when deviation exists, are the current STQ elapse times Tw(1,2...n)
or Td(1,2...n)
137a,b,...,n derived. The
time counting frequency of their measurement depends on
3) The current STQ elapse times Tw(1,2..n) or
Td(1,2..n) flow into so-called "information
pots"
4) An organism is equipped with "actuators" that influence a
self-referential change - that is
concurrently being recognized - in an organism's
temporal-spatial condition (e.g. its own
5) An essential consequence of these considerations is that a
teleological tendency inheres in
generates the ability for self-organisation. As seen
from Fig. 10, both "time" and "velocity"
unequivocally depend on the existence of sensors for
their perception. Actually, all time
data and information flow from the "present" (the
origin of the recording) into the "past" (the
verifiable existence). Indeed, time and velocity are
not "sensed" as a continuum, but in the
|
FINAL SUMMERY |
|
1) The herein described invented method is universally applicable and
describes the ultimate achievable mechanisms and organisms. 2) Discrete time quantization methods, according to which the received signal is scanned and digitized at predetermined points in time, prove themselves to be inadequate in the generation of highly efficient autonomous self-organisation processes. 3) In redundancy-free autonomous self-organizing systems, there are no "points in time" and there is no determinism. In these systems, STQ elapse times are quantized which are derived from the temporal/spatial changes in physical conditions between sensors and
external sources. The time recording has in each case a quantum nature; i.e. it has the properties of a "discrete counting", no matter whether the recording is analogue or digital. Moreover, the time recording is subjective and passive; i.e. the time quanta are "sensed" and not
"objectively measured" as in the conventional physical
understanding.
zation process, as well as with the number and
variety of sensors or receptors. tion) without the comparison of currently acquired elapse time patterns with previously recorded elapse time patterns. Briefly stated, there is no "timing" without accompanying "time keeping". 10) Auto-adaptation
theorem of Erich Bieramperl :
are approximately isomorphous.
Hence: TW
= vm adaptively acquired current STQ(i) or STQ(d) elapse times Tw
or Td
(timing), intelligent behaviour and
conscious action are produced.
|
| Consequences for metamathematics
and propositional calculus are:
|
|
1) Because there are
no deterministic point of times, the status of a system can neither be future status. There is nowhere any type of determinism. Since the classical physics as well as the quantum theory are based on the postulate that a system is in a certain status at a certain "point in time" (in the first case as points of phase space, and in the other case as probability distributions in phase space), neither theory can be completely consistent (see also THOMAS BREUER / 1997) [1].
2) Regarding WIGNER (1961)[2], an absolutely universally valid theory would have to be capable of describing the origin of human consciousness. The auto-adaptation theory described herein could be capable of this; the quantum theory cannot. (Wigner postulated that complex quantum mechanics delivers a usable description of the physical reality only when there is no "subjective sensing". The author holds the view that subjective sensing also exists in atomic and subatomic structures).
3) Sequences of
elapse times like TW and TW'
are definable as strings of an axiomatic formal also by a mechanical procedure, which produces "formulas and algorithms".For this reason, the known logic theorems of GOEDEL, TARSKI or HENKIN are absolutely applicable on such a model. GOEDEL`s incompleteness theorem [3] shows that each extensive number theoretical model includes consistent formulations which cannot be proven with the rules of the model, and which therefore are undecidable. This is valid also to metatheoretical models and to meta-metatheoretical models etc. For example, a self- referential metatheoretical sentence like the type of the Goedel formulation <I am provable> is neither provable nor disprovable. A decision procedure for this proposition leads to an infinite regress. TARSKI showed that a decision procedure for number theoretical "truth"[4]
is also
impossible, and leads to an infinite regress. Thus, a self-referential
sentence of is a weaker notion than "truth". HENKIN showed that there are sentences, that assert their own provability and "producibility" in a specific number theoretical model and which are invariable "true"[5]. A self-referential sentence based on Henkins theorem would be: <It exists a number theoretical model in which I am provable>. Strings of quantized elapse times like TW and TW' approach the domain of validity of HENKIN`s theorem. Applying Henkins logic, these strings assert: <I will be produced to proved>. TW and TW's are therefore strings or sentences that are produced in a specific formal model, which induces its own decision procedure on truth, consistence, completeness and provability through
continued self-generation (see also
description to Fig.10). elapse times are never asserted to be "true", "consistent", "complete" or "provable" to a certain "point in time", because within the "number theoretical model" in which they are produced, no "points of time" exist. This model also prohibits superior semantics or metatheories or meta-metatheories. It is plainly obvious that each formal system, each metatheory, each meta-metatheory and each semantics, in which axioms, strings or sentences of any type are formulated, is the result of continued autonomous adaptation (which is based on the quantization of elapse times) and therefore a derivation of the model described in this work.
4) The
cognition, that a specific formal system exists asserting absolute
universal validity, from is not new. Already in early antiquity, many years before PLATO and ARISTOTLE, the Hebrew Scriptures (2. Moses 3: 14) let this <source of all logic> say from itself: "JHWH" (spoken: Jahwe or Jehovah), that is about: "I shall be proved"[6]. This sentence asserts its own decision procedure on provability, truth, completeness and consistence; through a
specific formal system, that it "induces to
be".
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Important notes:
The Tetragrammaton „YHWH” (or “JHWH”) originates from a Hebrew verb that means “to
become”. It is to be understood in a CAUSATIVE manner, and enunciates an imperfect
aspect. This verb unequivocally has a FUTURISTIC connotion.
Therefore, self-referenced sentences like “I shall be proved” or “I induce it to be” or “I
cause it to become” have the same meaning in propositional calculus. The same applies
to a non-selfreferenced sentence like “He causes it to become”. They all are “HENKIN”-
sentences.
By the way, a sentence in the form of “I am” or “I am that I am” or “I am who
I am” (e.g. in the King James Bible or Luther-Bible) is neither a Goedel- nor a Henkin-
sentence. It is a tautology. It is very unlikely - even from a purely scientific point of view -
that Jesus Christ would have said: "Father, glorify your name" (John 12:28) when this refers
only to such a simple tautology.
Furthermore, the following facts result from
this statement:
- "YHWH" (or “JHWH”) as creator of all beings is NOT
bound to the existence of "time".
He/ she/ it also exists as an
exclusive and mere mathematical/ logical condition. So also
"outside" and beyond a so-called
"big bang". (Such a primitive state, in which
only the
laws of mathematics and logic
exist, is also referred to by physicists as the "ground
state of the universe”).
“Why is there something rather than
nothing?” Because the answer is: "YHWH" (or
“JHWH”) also exists in "nothing",
i. e. as a mere mathematical / logical condition.
Since this condition does not stand
alone, but brings something into existence through
its very existence, there is
no "nothingness" either.
- The existence of such a creative
principle (strictly speaking: "being" and principle in
unity) necessarily implies
two contrary views:
A = The perspective of "YHWH" (or “JHWH”) itself, which results from
the continued activity.
It is "timeless"; i.e. not tied
to any time when it takes place.
B = The perspective of any being "created" by this activity, which
at a time T is considering
that created. This view
requires the existence of "time", is subordinate to view A, and
depends on "YHWH" (or "YHWH").
Let`s summarize:
Every type of view,
approach or perspective of type B implies undecidable formulations
according to Gödel and
Tarski. It leads to decision procedures, which ends in an infinite
regress. It is
therefore subordinate to the type A.
Finally, it should also
be noted that according to the view, approach or perspective of
the type B nothing
could have come into existence. The Henkin logic A ("YHWH" or
“JHWH”) works continuously to
overcome the logical bounds set by B.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
e-mail bitte an: info@sensortime.com
