Signal Processing in Biological Structures
How Does Information Reach the Brain?
How Does
Selforganization Emerge?
Two different bio-information theories in confrontation
Autoadaptation-Theory vs Correlation-Theory
What means "Autoadaption t heory"
?
-
Neither points-in-time
nor correlations nor deterministically
measured data are existing
- There
exists neither an "arrow-of-time" nor a "course-of-time" ,
but only a "course-of-events".
-
There is no "physical value". There are only values of "i ntensity "
or "stimuli".
-
Only "e lapse times"
t1, t2, t3....
tn become passively/sensitively derived from phase
transitions.
-
Recently stored time-sequences
get consecutively compared with previously stored
time sequences.
-
Therof: "a utoadaption" ,
a uto- optimisation"
und "self-organisation"
is resulting
What means "C orrelation
theory" ?
-
point-in-time t 1,
t 2,
t 3....
t n correlates to deterministically
measured values
or data
x (t);
y (t).
Besides:
Read about
one of the greatest
patent- and invention scandal
in the history. THE BIG THEFT . Here
is the documentation
SENSOR
TIMING / 1978 bis 2010
Autoadaptation Theory
Correlation Theory
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
scientific-
Sensualism (Mach)
rationalism
philosophical
radical constructivism (v. Foerster)
realism
background
panpsychism (Rench)
platonism
monismus
dualism
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fundamental
sensoric information aquisition
deterministic or semi-deterministic
principles
There are neither points-in-time
t(n) nor
information aquisition
quantified measurement-values
Time discreet sampling of time-continuous
Only elapse time patterns - deriving from
signals - at any point-in-time t(n) - generates
phase trasitions - get aquisited.
a measurement value featuring a real and
"Information" is deriving in a secondary
quantified "information".
process by comparing and analyzing those patterns.
technologic
Autoadaptation Theorem (Bieramperl, 1999)
signal amplitudes
basis
elapse time measurement
time data comparation & covariance analyzation
Fourier-Transformation & -Analyse
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
technicistic
("Method to Generate Self-Organizing
of A/D-converters (Digital Signal Processing)
few literature published, until about 1970 research &
development only in industrial & military hands, many
inventors & developers got expropriated and stolen;
Since about 1972 wide approval in cybernetics,
controlling & timing technology (Unbehauen, Caines)
Since about 1980 known as "sampling technology" -
a term used in computer-tech, measurement tech,
communication technology, robotic und KI
KI-main proponents are: Minsky, Hofstadter,
Moravec, McCarthy, Searle, Burgard and many more
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(bio-informatics)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fundamental
The A.-theory prevailingly considers the brain to be
C.-theory prevailingly considers the brain to be a
brain function
a phaenotypical generated "working memory" which
genotypical generated "program memory" consisting
got the ability to log and store elapse-times deriving
of innumerable program parts (schemata), and which
of phase transitions of signal amplitudes, generated
has got the ability to confirm randomly - via sensor/
by receptory/sensory stimuli. The time data get
receptor - at a point-in-time t(n) aquired information
compared in the synapses. If high probability of cova-
by means of postsynaptic ESPS or ISPS to evoke
riance, a "confiming status" get produced via post-
either activating or inhibition (of muscles etc).
synaptic EPSP or IPSP which either evokes activating
or inhibition of connected nerve fibers, muscles etc.
The synaptic CNS-system`s attribute is to generate
Time dependent correlation of informations can
contineously new complex elapse-time-patterns which
change the "schemata" and generate new synaptic
get stored and compared. Only found covariant patterns
connections.
represent actual "information".
The C.-Theorie prevailingly denies any synaptic
There is a tendency to improve pattern covariance-
storing of aquired information. The theory considers
recognition contineously. Better and faster recognition
the generation of new synapses and neuronal
otherwise improves adaptation, and optimizes the
connections als "program expansion" in relation
phaenotyps` timing abilities. Consecutive generation
to new acquired information, for which processing
of new synaptic and neuronal connections in the brain
the previos program is not complex enough.
is likewise resulting of said tendency toward faster
and improves pattern-finding and -recognition. (This
is in a sense with Mach`s "thinking-economy".)
Generally, the A.-theory postulates: All what has got
Generally, the C.-theory postulates: All what has
perceived in sensory/receptory manner has the nature
got perceived in sensory/receptory manner has
of elapse times und is therefore NO primary & directly
the nature primary & directly processable
processable measurement value or "information"!
measurement value or "information".
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Signal processing The frequency of
the AP`s (action potentials) or EP`s
According to C.-theory, the EP ("electrotonic
in the brain
(electronotonic potentials) - evoking from receptor cell
potential") or AP ("action potential" - which is
(A short summary) stimuli -
serve for the identification of those intensity-
propagating along the cell membrane or axon fiber
ranges where perceived stimulus are presently occuring.
to a synapse, if a stimulus occurs) is serving for
AP-speed (velocity of conduction along an axon-fiber)
the time discreet sampling of each receptory/
determines the time-counting-rate with which the elapse
sensory-perceived time-contineous signal
times get acquired and stored by the synapses. This is
amplitude; and it therefore it contains primary
done via vesicle filling time, Ca++ions flux time, time
processable and quantified INFORMATION.
the vesicle requires to move towards a pore at the para-
crystalline vesicle-lattice and other significant time-
The synapses - at which their presynaptic
dependent synapse-parameters.
inputs the AP`s flow in - are prevailingly parts
Each synapse represents a complex time pulse generator, of a superior
"program memory" that comprises
time data memory, processor and time data analyzer.
the entire brain. They have no time-storing or
The difference of a AP- or EP-velocity along an axon
analyzing function.
fiber correlates to a different dynamic and/or relative
The AP-frequency along the cell membrane or
velocity of the temporar/spatial movement. (A stimulus
axons correlates with the present stimulus-
can occur under varying dynamic and relative velocity
intensity at the neuron cell. (In consensus with
between the receptor`s position and the object`s
A.-theory).
- respectively transmitter`s - position).
The C.-theory postulates correlation of increasing
To enable the recognition of dynamic stimuli under
probability of exocytoses (release of neuro-
changing temporar/spatial conditions, the synapse
transmitters into the synaptic cleft) with intensity
adapts the time puls rate with which the elapse time get
of neuronal stimulus and higher AP-frequency.
measured. In this way an autonomous adaption of
But they cannot explain, why - though high and
elapse time patterns becomes accomplished.
constant AP-frequency - an exocytosis can in one
If a presently aquired and synaptically stored elapse
case happen, in another case not.
time pattern coincides approximately with an elapse-
According to C.-theory, differences of AP-
time pattern previously acquired and stored, the
propagation-velocities in the cell membranes
synapse releases the entire vesicle content (neuro-
(axons) serve for the synchronization of exocytoses
transmitter molecules) into the synaptic cleft, which
in different - spatial separated - neuronal systems.
triggers an EPSP or IPSP in the sub-synaptic membrane
"Temporal coincidence" (correlation) of exocytoses
or nerve fibers. This causes e.g. activating or inhibition
shall generate new neuronal connections. In this
of a muscle. The receptory/sensory signal amplitude
way, the short-term memory should be controlled,
in this way got "recognized" by the brain.
and "consciousness" should be generated.
A multitude of such recognizing processes in different
brain regions and synaptic time pattern hierarchies leads
to "consciousness".
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recent
situation
The autoadaptation theory - described in US
6172941 Neuro-physiology und informatics
during the 80ies
regarding
get more and more confirmed through the results of
has proven the origin thesis of the C.-theory
verification/
informatic science and experimental brain researches.
(based on shannons sampling), whereupon AP`s
falsification
are containing quantified information, to be untenable.
Already in 1972, D. Koshland /R. Macnab experimen-
All AP`s propagate along the cell membranes nearly
tally proved that bacteria react upon temporal gradients,
congruent; independent of the signal amplitude course
but not upon spatial gradients e.g. when they move away
of the stimulus.
from an attractant (or towards to) - see L. Styrer`s
Indeed, proponents of the C.-theory are often referring
"biochemistry". Other literary sources are:
that generation of information upon exclusive base of
"Bacteria Appear to Send Message To Each Other"
sensoric v/t-acquisition (elapse time patterns) in the
Migrating birds navigate with inherent "watches"
in co-
had not enough success. But they
do not appreciate
operation with extremely sensitive receptors. Their
the fact, dass technicistic structures for elapse time
brains measure temporar gradients, see:
representation of sensor signal amplidudes are
The assumption, that the time structure of a stimulus
nano-tech with relevant features will prove elapse
has an influence to the brain`s function, is not new.
time logging and analyzing futurely as superior.
This idea came up in the 50ies and entered into science Indeed:
technicistic structures can never operate
by the name "synchronization hypothesis" (D. O. Hebb,
competely free of redundancy; but the brain can.
1949). But for a long time it remained without any
proof. One reason for this deficiency was the scientific
misinterpretation and mix-up of the terms "synchro-
A very impertant point in the verification of both
nization" and "auto-adaptation".
theories is the fact of conscious TIME PERCEPTION.
The difference of both terms got explicitly pointed out
How can TIME get perceived in the brain if no synap-
In the 80ies and 90ies, Christoph v. d. Malsburg and
time takes place? The C.-theory has got no answer.
W. Singer rediscovered Hobbs hypothesis and postu-
Because: with discreet sampling of signal amplitudes
latet their "correlations-theory" on base of the con-
just THAT physical value cannot be measured and
temporary mechanicistic signal processing knokledge....
quantified which is of MOST IMPORTANCE!
The A.-theory, however, is a new revolutionary theory
On the other hand:
that bases on advanced informatics knowledge. It can
If there is no synaptic recording of single elapse
explain innummeral biological, neuro-physiological
times, where is time perception (in neurobiologic
und psychological phenomenons, such like:
sense) emerging from; as epi-phenomenon?
"Neurogenesis in the adult is involved in the formation
genom research cannot explain or solve that
of trace memories " ,
see:
questions in successful manner . See:
"A zebrafish homologue of the chemokine receptor
Cxcr4 is a germ-cell guidance receptor":
view of correlationists, the results were unsatisfying.
they wrote:
The above mentioned auto-adaptive adjustment of
"beside this, the way and manner HOW time intervals
synaptic elapse time counting rate to acquire stimuli-
get recorded and recalled by the brain, is recently
patterns under relative movement and velocity too,
beyond our state of knowledge"
(and to find covariant time patterns under dynamic
"Up to now it has not been clarified, whether for tempo-
conditions) has been proven meanwhile through
rary organization different but parallel occuring
serious researches, see:
events only ONE inherent watch is sufficient; or
"Bidirectional synaptic plasticity in the cerebellum-like
- if instead of this - the cooperation of a several
mammalian dorsal cochlear..."
inherent watches has to be taken into consideration"
Fundamentalistic US-correlationists meanwhile even
have critizied the manner of information-acquistion in
the brain as being a "method of the Stone Age".
consequences
Its applicability to molecular/atomar structures
for the physical
speaks well for the auto-adaptation-theory.
view of universe
see e.g.:
"Crystal remembers sounds"
http://www.nature.com/nsu/020916/020916-19.html
A wide range of consequences for the physical
view of the universe has got pointed out in:
(see last chapter).
A.-theory postulates the existence of a
universal teleological tendency in the universe
that effects contrary to the 2. main sentence of
thermo dynamics.
Meanwhile some physicists have proven the
existence of such a tendency in the micro-cosmic
sphere.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
consequences
See last chapter of:
and
epistemology
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
consequences
The autoadaption-theory does not support the
in regard to the
maintained models and opinions of the trendy evolution
theory of evolution theory. Rather,
the "intelligent Design"-theory (M. Behe).
If
a universal teleologic tendency to auto-adaption, auto-
emolution
or auto-optimization exists, such a principle
would
contineously retroact against "blind" selection
and
mutation (as a result of accidents)..
The
base-principle of auto-adaptation tries consecutively
to
improve and optimize the existant structures in the
universe;
and it eliminates emerging non-adaptive or
redundant
structures AT ONCE (and NOT under
probalistic "permission" of innumeral declining structures
for
long periods of time - to find out the "most-adaptive
structure"
in evolutionary manner). --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
e-mail :
info@sensortime.com
you are the visitor Nr
:
t